100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Applicant contests council refusal of hinterland visitor accommodation

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Teen wins $100 bet with spur-of-the-moment marathon

A 14-year-old has stunned his teacher, friends and family after running an unplanned marathon to win a $100 bet. What started as a casual classroom More

Club to unveil final stage of multimillion-dollar revamp

An iconic surf club is about to throw open the doors on an ambitious upgrade. The Coolum Surf Club is expected to reopen on Friday More

Coast roads take heavy toll on native wildlife

Wildlife volunteers are warning motorists to take extra care on Sunshine Coast roads after hundreds of native animals were killed or injured by vehicles More

$45.4m state-of-the-art library set to open

A long-awaited new community space combining modern library services, interactive learning spaces and council services under one roof is almost ready to open. The purpose-built More

Big homes, small families: the Aussie housing mismatch

A property research firm suggests a broad-based land tax could incentivise small households living in big houses to downsize as a way to redress More

Photo of the day: kite trails

“Kite surfers make white trails on Pumicestone Passage, Golden Beach,” writes Cilla Skinner. If you have a photo of the day offering, email photo@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. Photos More

An appeal has been lodged against Sunshine Coast Council’s refusal of an application for a short-stay accommodation complex on a scenic route.

The Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust had applied to the council for a material change of use to allow development of 38 short-term accommodation units at 862-894 Landsborough-Maleny Road, Bald Knob.

A majority of councillors voted against the application on January 30 after a development assessment report recommended it be refused for various reasons, including the proposal’s failure to protect scenic views.

Presidential Capital, as trustee for the Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust, has made an application to the Planning and Environment Court requesting the decision be overturned and the development be approved.

In a notice of appeal, it says the proposed development meets the assessment benchmarks identified by the council and will protect the scenic amenity of the area.

An impression of the complex from one level looking towards another. Picture: Place Design Group

The notice says the proposed development will continue to “preserve, protect, maintain and enhance the visual, landscape and scenic amenity values of the locality” so the scenic route “will continue to provide a high level of scenic and visual amenity”.

It says the proposed development does not detract from the visual amenity of the scenic route, is “visually unobtrusive relative to its setting” when viewed from the scenic route, and it maintains or enhances views from the scenic route.

Although the council, in its reasons for refusal, described the bulk and scale of the development as “urban in nature” and of an “intensity and scale that is not expected in a rural precinct”, the notice of appeal describes the proposed development as low key, both visually and in scale, so as to not detract from the scenic amenity offered from the scenic route.

A diagram showing the line of sight over the buildings from Landsborough-Maleny Road. Picture: Norman Richards Building Design and Interiors

The notice says the proposed development is located and designed to protect the landscape values and amenity of surrounding premises.

It says it will integrate with and complements the predominantly rural character of the area, and “sensitively responds” to the environmental and landscape.

“The proposed development will not impact on local views of importance and those views continue to be protected,” it says.

The notice says there is a need for the development, which will support nearby non-residential uses and provide economic benefit.

It says the development would not cause any more negative impact than lawful activities on the land that do not need a development approved.

The council is yet to respond.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share