100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Five-storey data centre proposed for city centre

The Coast’s evolution into a digital and commercial hub looks set to continue after a proposal was submitted to develop a major new data More

Disruptions ‘unavoidable’ as council staff plan next strike

Union members at Noosa Council are set to strike again in an ongoing dispute over wages and conditions, with the council saying a drop More

‘Huge cost’: illegal dumping sparks call for action

A local council is calling on the community for help after a significant illegal dumping incident was discovered. A large volume of waste was left More

B2B: Changes mean buyer and seller must beware

Major changes relating to the purchase and sale of property in Queensland are coming into effect on August 1, 2025. Traditionally, it has been up More

Photo of the day: flowering gum

"A glorious display of flowering gum trees makes morning walks around Shelly Beach even more enjoyable," Ruth Fiechtner remarked after taking this photo. If you More

Belated bonanza: man finds forgotten lotteries ticket

A Sunshine Coast man is $100,000 richer after he discovered a forgotten Lucky Lotteries ticket in his wallet. The Birtinya local claimed first prize in More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share