100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Lottery lane: street to feature prize homes

A suburban street is set to become one of the Sunshine Coast's most prized locations. Butler Street at Tewantin will feature four homes that can More

Major roads closed for rescheduled endurance event

Several of the Sunshine Coast's main roads will be closed for an annual event that will attract about 5000 competitors this weekend. Key routes including More

Sami Muirhead: Alfred through a new lens

Have you ever been ‘dumpster diving’? I did a few weeks ago. I must say, climbing into my radio station’s industrial bin, searching for my favourite More

Photo of the day: grace on water

A tranquil morning at the lake at Sippy Downs. This photo was taken by Peter Correya. If you have a photo of the day offering, More

Coles recalls spinach products amid possible contamination

Coles is recalling various pre-packed spinach products sold in their supermarkets, stores and online in Queensland and northern New South Wales. The grocery giant is More

Arena plans at heart of $10b Coast transformation

The Sunshine Coast could be in line to host more events at the 2032 Olympics and Paralympics, thanks to the expected delivery of an More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share