100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Business column: Talkin’ ’bout my generation … being skipped

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Jane Stephens: a powerful force for good

Fear has always accompanied technological change. When elevators first appeared, passengers demanded human operators. The internet was once viewed as dangerous and internet bank transfers More

Second teen charged after car crash near town centre

Police have charged a second teenager following an alleged dangerous driving incident in a Sunshine Coast town earlier this week. Police allege a white Honda More

Fire ant nest found by detection dogs

A team of odour detection dogs from the National Fire Ant Eradication Program has uncovered another fire ant nest on the Sunshine Coast. The nest More

Beachfront plan tests height restrictions

Plans have been lodged for an apartment development that would exceed not one but two building height limits on a prominent coastal site. The adjoining More

Councillors divided over future of overflow parking

A plan to investigate the future of seasonal overflow parking at Noosa Heads' Lions Park will proceed after councillors were split over how the More

New shopping precinct attracts national brands

A new $80m retail precinct on the Sunshine Coast is set to open this month. Aura Home + Life, a 20,000sqm precinct developed by Capital More

With the ageing population, it is more common to assist clients in their 80s or 90s with a new Will.

It is not uncommon to receive instructions from older clients to skip their children as beneficiaries and make grandchildren beneficiaries instead.

Recently, the NSW Supreme Court considered a ‘generation skipping’ Will. The two daughters who were ‘skipped’ weren’t happy about it and contested their mother’s Will.

The NSW case did not have the ‘usual’ reason for generation skipping (that is, ‘my kids are retired now and don’t need it’).

The daughters in the NSW case were not close to retirement age, four of the five grandchildren were under 18 years and there were some relationship issues between the deceased and the daughters.

The Court referred to the ‘social norm’ that parents, not grandparents, are primarily responsible for educating and maintaining their children.

In this case, the daughters were successful in receiving further provision from their mother’s estate.

Perhaps, the decision would have been different if the daughters were at, or close to, retirement age.

Whether ‘generation skipping’ in estate planning is becoming a trend remains to be seen.

What is certain, is that each person’s estate plan is unique and requires careful consideration of all relevant circumstances.

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your name and email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share