100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Tribunal refuses customers’ push for default ruling against modular home builder

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Firm linked to global mega-projects behind $2.6b ‘tourism city’

A developer that has worked on major international projects including Singapore’s iconic Marina Bay Sands is behind a pitch to build a $2.6 billion More

Paramedics rush to serious motorway incident

Multiple paramedics have responded to a traffic incident on the Sunshine Motorway this morning that has caused delays. The incident occurred in the westbound lanes More

Adult learner swims to thank lifesavers

A woman who learnt to swim as an adult is taking the plunge to raise money for the emergency service that saved her husband’s More

Photo of the day: mirror image

Courtenay Noble took this amazing 'mirror image' photo of a lake at Mountain Creek.  If you have a photo of the day offering, email photo@sunshinecoastnews.com.au More.

Caloundra SMSF advisory firm wins major national recognition

Caloundra-based boutique firm Vivacè Advisory was named SMSF Firm of the Year at the 2025 SMSF Awards, securing one of the industry’s most competitive More

Design phase beckons for stadium expansion

The deputy premier says planning and procurement is well underway for the Sunshine Coast Stadium expansion and other Olympic infrastructure in the region, guaranteeing More

A Sunshine Coast-based builder of modular homes that is attempting to recover money it alleges is owed from customers has avoided a counter-claim in a tribunal ruling.

Dream Modular Homes Pty Ltd has applied to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal for the recovery of money it claims is owing by the respondents, Stephen Horseman and Rosemary Fitzgerald, who engaged the company for domestic building work.

A ruling by QCAT senior member Ian Brown delivered on April 11 but not published until May 28 outlines that the builder’s claim was filed in August, but that the respondents filed a counter-application in October.

“The respondents say that the works have not reached practical completion and that the applicant has no entitlement to the amount claimed,” it says.

“The respondents say that they are entitled to claim as a set-off an amount for loss of rent occasioned as a result of the delay by the applicant in bringing the works to practical completion.

“In the alternative, the respondents say that they are entitled to set off against the applicant’s claim an amount for late completion damages.”

Want more free local news? Follow Sunshine Coast News on Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram, and sign up for our FREE daily news email.

The ruling says the respondents then applied in January for a default decision as a result of the builder failing to file statements of evidence and a response to the counter-application in accordance with tribunal directions.

The response from the applicant conceded it had delayed in filing statements of evidence but had been hampered by other factors.

“Since the commencement of the proceeding, three persons have left the employ of the applicant, which has significantly impacted the ability of the applicant to locate relevant evidence and verify factual allegations made by the respondents,” it states.

“Upon undertaking review of the amounts claimed in the counter-application, the applicant formed the view that certain matters raised by the respondents ‘could have merit’.

“The applicant instructed its solicitor to make an open offer to the respondents reducing the amount claimed by the applicant by $31,286.55 and a subsequent open offer that each party walk away bearing their own costs.”

The ruling does not state how much the builder was claiming.

The tribunal, in refusing the January application, said it was not satisfied the consequences of the applicant’s failure to comply with tribunal directions warranted a decision by default.

“It may be accepted that the applicant’s claim is an arguable one. It may also be accepted that the applicant has not acted with celerity in the prosecution of its claim. Having made these observations it should be noted that this is not a matter in which the applicant has simply done nothing while failing to comply with tribunal directions,” it states.

The ruling ordered that the dispute progress to a compulsory conference.

The website of Dream Modular Homes says it is based in Chevallum.

“We’re an award-winning team of designers and builders passionate about redefining the way we build and live in Queensland,” it says.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share