100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Major resort reveals new design plans in bid to win cabins appeal

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Risky driving detected at popular beach

A man has been fined after police caught him driving above the speed limit with a child on his lap. At around 2.15pm on Saturday, More

Property acquisitions scaled back for transport project

The owners of dozens of properties that were earmarked for acquisition have been told their land will not be required by the state government. Many More

Access to popular beach flagged for review

The road, parking and pedestrian arrangements at a well-used coastal recreation area will be assessed by Sunshine Coast Council. More than $67,000 has been allocated More

Popular venue’s replacement decided

The future of one of the Sunshine Coast’s best-known waterfront venues has been revealed following its sudden closure, with new operators announcing a redevelopment, More

Residents seek safer speeds near busy sporting precinct

A petition calling for a 40km/h speed limit on a busy road near sporting fields has been presented to Sunshine Coast Council. The petition was More

Woman ‘exterminated’ after theft allegations, jury hears

A woman was "exterminated" by her housemates and her body dumped in bushland following allegations she was stealing from them, a jury has heard. Donna More

Updated site plans have been lodged as a major resort fights to build cabins in a known koala habitat.

The Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) is appealing to the Planning and Environment Court to have a decision to reject an expansion to its Noosa Heads resort overturned.

In June 2022 the resort applied to build 15 self-contained accommodation units at 94 and 142 Noosa Drive.

It also proposed a new lagoon pool within the existing RACV Noosa Resort complex, an additional 18 carparking spaces and alterations to the existing access.

However, Noosa Council refused the application in November 2023, labelling the development as “an unacceptable loss of vegetation”.

The two sites fall under the Tourist Accommodation Zone (TAZ) and Environmental Management and Conservation Zone (EM&CZ), with a total area of about 5.18 hectares.

An updated site plan for 15 cabins at RACV Noosa Resort. The orange area represents the Tourist Accommodation Zone. Picture: Aspect Architects.

According to court documentation, the amended plans are part of a minor change to the application and would reduce site cover, in turn increasing vegetation retention.

The original proposal outlined it would require the removal of 71 trees out of 242 to build the development, with a further 11 trees labelled as “to be confirmed”.

The amended plans now show the number of removed trees decreasing to 64, with five still to be confirmed.

There is also a proposed reduction of the site cover by 151sqm as well as the ground floor area by 152sqm.

Changes have been made to the size of proposed cabins at RACV Noosa Resort. Picture: Aspect Architects

This is due to decreasing the size of four of the cabins from two-bedroom units to one-bedroom units.

According to the plans, setbacks to the road and southwest boundary would also be increased and there would now be no built form within the EM&CZ.

“The proposed changes involve taking all of the built form of the development and placing it solely within the TAZ … rather than having some (very minor) incursions outside of that zone into the EM&CZ,” court document stated.

“This has been achieved by shifting the cabin locations (and other infrastructure) within the land, without involving any new or additional land.”

The application for a minor change was heard in the Brisbane Planning and Environment Court on October 8. The matter is listed for review again on November 5.

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. You must include your name and suburb.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share