100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Business column: Talkin’ ’bout my generation … being skipped

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

‘Snapped’: man to stand trial for cold case murder

A man accused of murdering his partner and leaving her body at the base of a cliff snapped before her death, a court has More

Police investigate fatal crash

The Forensic Crash Unit is investigating after a fatal traffic crash on the Sunshine Coast. Police and emergency services attended Diamond Valley Road at Diamond More

Property demolitions underway for road upgrade

The first of several properties are being removed in the heart of the Sunshine Coast, to make way for a revamped thoroughfare. Two homes are More

Italian offering from successful Indian restaurant owner

A local restaurateur known for building three successful Indian eateries has taken a fresh turn into Italian cuisine with his newest venture. The newly-opened Flavino More

Community battery project underway

Installation is underway on a battery that will store excess rooftop solar power during the day and feed it back into the local grid More

‘Scared for years’: child of cold-case murder accused

A man accused of murdering his girlfriend decades ago pressured his child to tell police he stayed at home on the night she died, More

With the ageing population, it is more common to assist clients in their 80s or 90s with a new Will.

It is not uncommon to receive instructions from older clients to skip their children as beneficiaries and make grandchildren beneficiaries instead.

Recently, the NSW Supreme Court considered a ‘generation skipping’ Will. The two daughters who were ‘skipped’ weren’t happy about it and contested their mother’s Will.

The NSW case did not have the ‘usual’ reason for generation skipping (that is, ‘my kids are retired now and don’t need it’).

The daughters in the NSW case were not close to retirement age, four of the five grandchildren were under 18 years and there were some relationship issues between the deceased and the daughters.

The Court referred to the ‘social norm’ that parents, not grandparents, are primarily responsible for educating and maintaining their children.

In this case, the daughters were successful in receiving further provision from their mother’s estate.

Perhaps, the decision would have been different if the daughters were at, or close to, retirement age.

Whether ‘generation skipping’ in estate planning is becoming a trend remains to be seen.

What is certain, is that each person’s estate plan is unique and requires careful consideration of all relevant circumstances.

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your name and email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share