100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Applicant contests council refusal of hinterland visitor accommodation

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Police target youth behaviour in coastal suburbs

Police are increasing high-visibility patrols and weapon detection efforts to tackle youth antisocial behaviour in two neighbouring areas of the Sunshine Coast. Officers have been More

Terraced seawall starts to take shape, first section to open soon

A new seawall at a Sunshine Coast main beach is coming together, with the first section expected to open before winter. Construction of the wall More

‘High risk’: Bruce Highway rated state’s worst road

The Bruce Highway is the state’s most dangerous road, according to new data. The study, which analysed speed camera activity and government crash data, gives More

‘I felt sick’: mayor apologises for conflict of interest

Noosa Mayor Frank Wilkie has apologised for a conflict of interest linked to a proposed streetscape project at Peregian Beach, prompting a delay in More

Drones to take wildlife rescue to new heights

The acquisition of drones is expected to help a local conservation group's wildlife rescue efforts. The equipment, made possible by Unitywater’s Healthy and Thriving Community Grants More

New e-scooter laws to hit state parliament

The state government will introduce sweeping new e-mobility laws to parliament this week, accepting all 28 recommendations from a parliamentary inquiry aimed at improving More

An appeal has been lodged against Sunshine Coast Council’s refusal of an application for a short-stay accommodation complex on a scenic route.

The Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust had applied to the council for a material change of use to allow development of 38 short-term accommodation units at 862-894 Landsborough-Maleny Road, Bald Knob.

A majority of councillors voted against the application on January 30 after a development assessment report recommended it be refused for various reasons, including the proposal’s failure to protect scenic views.

Presidential Capital, as trustee for the Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust, has made an application to the Planning and Environment Court requesting the decision be overturned and the development be approved.

In a notice of appeal, it says the proposed development meets the assessment benchmarks identified by the council and will protect the scenic amenity of the area.

An impression of the complex from one level looking towards another. Picture: Place Design Group

The notice says the proposed development will continue to “preserve, protect, maintain and enhance the visual, landscape and scenic amenity values of the locality” so the scenic route “will continue to provide a high level of scenic and visual amenity”.

It says the proposed development does not detract from the visual amenity of the scenic route, is “visually unobtrusive relative to its setting” when viewed from the scenic route, and it maintains or enhances views from the scenic route.

Although the council, in its reasons for refusal, described the bulk and scale of the development as “urban in nature” and of an “intensity and scale that is not expected in a rural precinct”, the notice of appeal describes the proposed development as low key, both visually and in scale, so as to not detract from the scenic amenity offered from the scenic route.

A diagram showing the line of sight over the buildings from Landsborough-Maleny Road. Picture: Norman Richards Building Design and Interiors

The notice says the proposed development is located and designed to protect the landscape values and amenity of surrounding premises.

It says it will integrate with and complements the predominantly rural character of the area, and “sensitively responds” to the environmental and landscape.

“The proposed development will not impact on local views of importance and those views continue to be protected,” it says.

The notice says there is a need for the development, which will support nearby non-residential uses and provide economic benefit.

It says the development would not cause any more negative impact than lawful activities on the land that do not need a development approved.

The council is yet to respond.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share