100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Applicant contests council refusal of hinterland visitor accommodation

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Woman ‘exterminated’ after theft allegations, jury hears

A woman was "exterminated" by her housemates and her body dumped in bushland following allegations she was stealing from them, a jury has heard. Donna More

New centre opens for tinnitus sufferers

A dedicated tinnitus healthcare centre is set to open on the Sunshine Coast, aiming to improve access to specialised support for residents living with More

Ashley Robinson: service is more than a smile

To borrow a line from a popular radio personality-turned-corporate leader: “Is it just me?” When I interact with the service industry, it feels like things More

Search starts for new SEQ dam site

The state’s water supplier has been tasked with identifying a new South-East Queensland dam site, to secure water supply for the growing population. The Queensland More

‘No warning’: business fears impact of amenities build

A riverside business owner has raised concerns about the impact of a $1 million toilet block project, warning construction works could make trading almost More

Police appeal for information after alleged assault

Police are appealing for public assistance following an alleged late-night assault on the Sunshine Coast. It is alleged that a group of eight males approached More

An appeal has been lodged against Sunshine Coast Council’s refusal of an application for a short-stay accommodation complex on a scenic route.

The Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust had applied to the council for a material change of use to allow development of 38 short-term accommodation units at 862-894 Landsborough-Maleny Road, Bald Knob.

A majority of councillors voted against the application on January 30 after a development assessment report recommended it be refused for various reasons, including the proposal’s failure to protect scenic views.

Presidential Capital, as trustee for the Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust, has made an application to the Planning and Environment Court requesting the decision be overturned and the development be approved.

In a notice of appeal, it says the proposed development meets the assessment benchmarks identified by the council and will protect the scenic amenity of the area.

An impression of the complex from one level looking towards another. Picture: Place Design Group

The notice says the proposed development will continue to “preserve, protect, maintain and enhance the visual, landscape and scenic amenity values of the locality” so the scenic route “will continue to provide a high level of scenic and visual amenity”.

It says the proposed development does not detract from the visual amenity of the scenic route, is “visually unobtrusive relative to its setting” when viewed from the scenic route, and it maintains or enhances views from the scenic route.

Although the council, in its reasons for refusal, described the bulk and scale of the development as “urban in nature” and of an “intensity and scale that is not expected in a rural precinct”, the notice of appeal describes the proposed development as low key, both visually and in scale, so as to not detract from the scenic amenity offered from the scenic route.

A diagram showing the line of sight over the buildings from Landsborough-Maleny Road. Picture: Norman Richards Building Design and Interiors

The notice says the proposed development is located and designed to protect the landscape values and amenity of surrounding premises.

It says it will integrate with and complements the predominantly rural character of the area, and “sensitively responds” to the environmental and landscape.

“The proposed development will not impact on local views of importance and those views continue to be protected,” it says.

The notice says there is a need for the development, which will support nearby non-residential uses and provide economic benefit.

It says the development would not cause any more negative impact than lawful activities on the land that do not need a development approved.

The council is yet to respond.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share