100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Applicant contests council refusal of hinterland visitor accommodation

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Federal scrutiny triggers consultation on road project

Public consultation about the potential environmental impacts of a proposed 1.6km road bypass has commenced, weeks after construction tenders for the project were released. The More

Olympic mountain bike centre details revealed

A world-class Olympic mountain bike facility is set to open to the public well in advance of the 2032 Games and is expected to More

Waste facility fire sparks battery warning

A waste facility blaze has prompted authorities to remind residents to safely dispose of used batteries. Noosa Council waste coordinator Peita Otterbach said investigations into More

Spike in danger: invasive weed found in hinterland

A high-risk invasive plant has been detected in the Sunshine Coast hinterland, prompting a warning from the council and renewed calls for residents to More

Seafood supply assured at Easter despite fuel challenges

Sunshine Coast fishing operators say an abundant supply of fresh, local catches will be available for Easter despite fuel shortages. Rockliff Seafood PR manager Vanessa More

Beachgoers urged to film and report driving offences

Visitors to some of Queensland's most popular 4WD and camping beaches have been encouraged to record and report misbehaving motorists during the Easter school More

An appeal has been lodged against Sunshine Coast Council’s refusal of an application for a short-stay accommodation complex on a scenic route.

The Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust had applied to the council for a material change of use to allow development of 38 short-term accommodation units at 862-894 Landsborough-Maleny Road, Bald Knob.

A majority of councillors voted against the application on January 30 after a development assessment report recommended it be refused for various reasons, including the proposal’s failure to protect scenic views.

Presidential Capital, as trustee for the Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust, has made an application to the Planning and Environment Court requesting the decision be overturned and the development be approved.

In a notice of appeal, it says the proposed development meets the assessment benchmarks identified by the council and will protect the scenic amenity of the area.

An impression of the complex from one level looking towards another. Picture: Place Design Group

The notice says the proposed development will continue to “preserve, protect, maintain and enhance the visual, landscape and scenic amenity values of the locality” so the scenic route “will continue to provide a high level of scenic and visual amenity”.

It says the proposed development does not detract from the visual amenity of the scenic route, is “visually unobtrusive relative to its setting” when viewed from the scenic route, and it maintains or enhances views from the scenic route.

Although the council, in its reasons for refusal, described the bulk and scale of the development as “urban in nature” and of an “intensity and scale that is not expected in a rural precinct”, the notice of appeal describes the proposed development as low key, both visually and in scale, so as to not detract from the scenic amenity offered from the scenic route.

A diagram showing the line of sight over the buildings from Landsborough-Maleny Road. Picture: Norman Richards Building Design and Interiors

The notice says the proposed development is located and designed to protect the landscape values and amenity of surrounding premises.

It says it will integrate with and complements the predominantly rural character of the area, and “sensitively responds” to the environmental and landscape.

“The proposed development will not impact on local views of importance and those views continue to be protected,” it says.

The notice says there is a need for the development, which will support nearby non-residential uses and provide economic benefit.

It says the development would not cause any more negative impact than lawful activities on the land that do not need a development approved.

The council is yet to respond.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share