100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Police appeal for help to find man missing for two weeks

Police are appealing for public assistance to locate a man last seen almost two weeks ago. Timothy Reynolds, 33, was reported missing from Rosemount on More

Your say: holiday park bookings, bank closure and more

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. You must include your name and More

Draft report on plan for 12,000 homes goes public

A developer’s plan to deliver up to 12,000 dwellings as part of a new masterplanned community has opened to public comment. Stockland has proposed to More

Popular headland path about to be revamped

One of the Sunshine Coast’s most well-known stretches of walkway is about to get a makeover. The 650m section of coastal path at Alexandra Headland, More

New community garden sprouts on Coast

The Sunshine Coast has a new community garden, providing residents of Meridan Plains a vibrant space to grow vegetables, herbs, flowers and fruit while More

Family mourning beloved cat after backyard dog attack

A Sunshine Coast family is mourning the loss of their beloved cat after it was attacked by two roaming dogs in its own backyard. Family More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share