100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Coast investment pipeline set to surge beyond $3.5b a year

The Sunshine Coast’s investment pipeline is projected to rise to $3.53 billion annually up to 2030, with transport, master-planned communities and tourism projects leading More

New bulk-billing urgent care clinic opens on Coast

A new seven-day bulk-billing urgent care clinic has opened on the Sunshine Coast, offering walk-in treatment for non-life-threatening injuries and illnesses. The Buderim Medicare Urgent More

Refreshed mural set to emerge from scaffolding

A revitalised mural on a highly visible Unitywater asset is almost ready to be revealed. Brisbane-based large-scale mural artists the Brightsiders had the challenge of working More

Photo of the day: stormy sunset

The sun setting over Bulcock Beach after a storm, by photographer Tom Regener. If you have a photo of the day offering, email photo@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. Photos More

Green light for $150m hotel on iconic street

A new hotel with 180 guest rooms could be operating by 2028 after Sunshine Coast Council gave the green light for the project. The construction More

CBD site with development approval sells for $17m

A site with existing development approval on a Coast town’s main street has sold for $17 million. The 6183sqm site at 139 Bulcock Street and More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share