100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Wellness hub proposed for former supermarket site

A vacant supermarket tenancy could soon have a new lease on life. The former W’Gusto IGA at 1 The Basin, Pelican Waters, has been earmarked More

Strong support for local visitor economy

Sunshine Coast tourism businesses are being urged to participate in Queensland Tourism Week, with the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games set to be More

UniSC study dives into sea cucumber mating

Sea cucumbers’ unusual sex lives are being closely studied by University of the Sunshine Coast researchers as they work to combat the threat of More

Ashley Robinson: I have an idea for a reality TV series

There is some crap on television. No, I may not be talking about Phil Gould this time, but lifestyle shows. It seems there are More

AI revolution hinges on data centre ‘social licence’

A data centre heavyweight has conceded the industry must work harder to assuage Australians' concerns about the artificial intelligence boom or risk US-level community More

‘Respected and beloved’: basketball legend remembered

Tributes have flowed for a respected teacher and basketball identity who made history as the first captain of the Brisbane Bullets before becoming a More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share