100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Free gardening talks showcase Australia’s top experts

Australia's largest gardening event is set to return to the Sunshine Coast in July. The Queensland Garden Show, from July 10 to 12, will bring More

Jane Stephens: bastardising the English language

My favourite English teacher would roll in her grave and my grandmother would tut-tut and shake her head. ‘Youse’ is now almost as prevalent in More

B2B: less of the two certainties in life

We are all going to pass away but is it possible to escape some of the recently announced tax reforms as we depart this More

Motorbike rider allegedly 82km/h over speed limit

A Sunshine Coast man has had his licence suspended after allegedly travelling well above the speed limit. Officers from Sunshine Coast Highway Patrol allegedly observed More

Sky spectacle: unusual cloud explained

People on the Sunshine Coast have been left impressed and bewildered by a relatively unusual weather phenomenon. Many were left scratching their heads at the More

Man charged over scooter theft

Police have charged a Sunshine Coast man after a custom-made disability scooter was allegedly stolen from the secure carpark of a business. Police allege two More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share