100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Liquidator appointed after closure of entertainment precinct

A liquidator has been appointed to the company behind an entertainment precinct, weeks after it ceased trading following its sudden closure announcement late last More

Surf club chef’s new venue a rare delicacy on the Coast

The executive chef behind one of the Sunshine Coast’s busiest surf clubs has opened his own cafe and restaurant in the Maroochydore CBD, bringing More

‘Relentless pressure’: brewery announces closure

Terella Brewing has announced it is set to close next month, ending a prolonged legal battle with Sunshine Coast Council over planning and land-use More

Council takes over delivery of growing city centre

Sunshine Coast Council will take over the delivery the Maroochydore city centre, bringing an end to the group that started it. Councillors voted unanimously yesterday More

Local tuna brand ‘takes on the big guys’

A Sunshine Coast tuna brand is set to expand its reach on the national and international stage. Walker's Tuna has been shortlisted for an Australian More

New bill sends message to ‘apprehensive’ local community

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli says new laws targeting antisemitism and access to weapons by terrorists and criminals would be introduced to state parliament next More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share