100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Councillors divided over future of overflow parking

A plan to investigate the future of seasonal overflow parking at Noosa Heads' Lions Park will proceed after councillors were split over how the More

New shopping precinct attracts national brands

A new $80m retail precinct on the Sunshine Coast is set to open this month. Aura Home + Life, a 20,000sqm precinct developed by Capital More

Big support needed for tiny build

From small things, big things grow. This is the premise behind a new life-skills project spearheaded by a Sunshine Coast independent school. Pacific Lutheran College More

Ashley Robinson: rounding up tech advances

I saw an interesting article in Sunshine Coast News last week. It read in part: “University of the Sunshine Coast (UniSC) students have taught robodogs new tricks, More

Concerns raised over infill’s impact on established suburb

A Sunshine Coast councillor has questioned the impact of increasing infill development, saying more duplexes and townhouses are changing the face of a long-standing More

Eight-year wait ends for major tourism project

A long-running proposal for a First Nations tourism precinct near Aussie World has been approved almost eight years after the original development application was More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share