100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Traffic almost doubles as road duplication advances

A 3.5km road duplication through one of the region’s fastest-growing communities is pushing into its next phases as governments play catch-up on transport infrastructure More

Prime site where distinctive pink home stood up for auction

A prominent site where a conspicuous pink house stood is set to go under the hammer. No.178 Brisbane Road, at a bustling Mooloolaba intersection, will More

Funding for housing facility for young people in need

A planned housing complex for young people facing homelessness is moving closer to construction after securing federal funding. The federal government has announced $12.6m to More

New Sunday market brings life to waterfront

A new market is set to bring handmade goods, live music and family entertainment to a popular waterfront destination. The Noosa Marina Sunday Markets will More

Summer swimming returns after pool upgrade

A major upgrade has brought swimmers back to a popular 50m pool, with summer operating hours now underway. The three-month project has delivered a major More

‘More than a place to buy plants’: garden centre to close

A garden centre that has sold plants and supplies for years while supporting young people with disability and autism will soon shut. The Steps Garden More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share