100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Fast-food outlet scrapped in site redesign

A proposed 24-hour food and drink outlet with a drive-through has been dropped from plans for a commercial development. The site at 11 South Coolum More

Road closures as ‘iconic event’ attracts thousands

A "bucket-list" event for triathletes will be held this weekend, when roads will be closed in and around a popular beach town. The 43rd edition More

Watchdog ‘spent millions’ as billionaire fined $10,000

A marathon legal battle sparked after Clive Palmer's dinosaur-inspired takeover of a championship golf course and resort has ended with a $10,000 fine. The Queensland More

Hospital among projects winning state honours

A $100 million private hospital delivered six weeks ahead of schedule is one of three Sunshine Coast projects to claim state construction honours. Maroochy Private More

Ashley Robinson: boo who? Boo you

I thought I had seen everything until a couple of Saturdays ago when I was watching the horse racing, and the crowd booed Hong More

B2B: stuck between property decisions?

A lot of people assume they only have two options when making a property move: buy first or sell first. When the timing doesn’t line More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share