100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Popular eatery makes way for approved 160-unit development

A much-loved restaurant in the heart of a Sunshine Coast town is closing down, amid plans to build a multi-storey apartment block in its More

Strong demand drives rapid land sellout

Shares in a major new residential development 58km north of Noosa were snapped up by investors within hours after an investment fund tied to More

‘Moving and meaningful’: Anzac Day services across the Coast

This Saturday the country will stop to remember the sacrifice and bravery of Australian and New Zealand servicemen and servicewomen, past and present. As the More

‘Privilege’: charity celebrates 40 years of service

A local mobile food delivery service for seniors, people with a disability and their carers has clocked up four decades in operation. Coolum Beach Meals More

Crews relish record-breaking dragon boat event

Dragon boat enthusiasts are savouring the sport's biggest ever Australian championships, held on the Sunshine Coast. Participants from 77 clubs around the country attended the More

Big win for Coast grassroots music festival

A Sunshine Coast hinterland festival has claimed one of Queensland’s top music awards, with organisers pointing to its volunteer-led model as the reason it More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share