100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Private health insurance prices could surge

Australians with private health insurance are being warned to brace for the possibility of the biggest price hike in almost a decade. Compare the Market More

Police investigate fatal traffic crash, appeal for help

A 46-year-old man has died following a serious traffic crash in Mooloolah Valley. Emergency services were called to Diamond Valley Road about 12.05am on January More

Quiet achievers honoured in Australia Day community awards

The Sunshine Coast’s quiet achievers have taken centre stage at the 2026 Australia Day Community Awards, with local volunteers, leaders and organisations recognised for More

Surfer’s e-foil ride halted by snake on popular beach

A stunned surfer’s e-foil ride was interrupted by an unexpected snake on a popular Coast beach on January 23. Natalie Crombie filmed a video as More

Police appeal for help to find man missing for two weeks

Police are appealing for public assistance to locate a man last seen almost two weeks ago. Timothy Reynolds, 33, was reported missing from Rosemount on More

Your say: holiday park bookings, bank closure and more

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. You must include your name and More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share