100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Eight-level development proposed for former medical site

A former medical site in a key CDB location could be redeveloped under plans lodged with Sunshine Coast Council. The site at 72 Duporth Avenue, More

Aussie wildcard into US Open’s last 32

Diminutive Dane Sweeny has won a real-life David-versus-Goliath battle to rock the US Open with a stunning second-round upset over dual grand slam semi-finalist More

New CEO named for fast-growing airport

A new chief executive officer has been announced for Sunshine Coast Airport, bringing extensive aviation, infrastructure and commercial experience to the role. Tony Edmondstone joins More

Private land part of proposed pest surveillance program

Noosa Council officers want to inspect selected private properties for invasive species over the next five years. A report prepared for Noosa Council’s general committee More

Entrepreneur turns allergy idea into winning venture

An allergy-management app designed to help people navigate everyday situations has taken top honours in a Sunshine Coast entrepreneurship challenge. The 2026 Generation Innovation Challenge More

Sami Muirhead: smile and say ‘cheesecake’

Do you have a dish that is your absolute favourite thing in the world? Perhaps it’s a creation that, when someone who loves you More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share