100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

‘Ten-to’ suburb steps out of the shadows

A “traditionally overlooked” suburb on the Sunshine Coast is starting to turn heads in real estate. Kuluin property prices have increased significantly in recent times, More

Council set to endorse major active transport strategy

Walking, riding and rolling are set to become a greater focus across the Sunshine Coast under a new long-term transport strategy. Sunshine Coast Council is More

Charity reveals most luxurious prize home yet

A long-running charity has unveiled its most expensive prize home package. Endeavour Lotteries is offering a $3.7 million windfall in the Sunshine Coast hinterland, including More

Business council questions federal budget impact

The Sunshine Coast’s peak business body has questioned whether the federal budget will deliver real and lasting benefits for the region. Sunshine Coast Business Council More

Beach works delay adds to business pain

A major Sunshine Coast foreshore project has been delayed by at least six months, extending the financial pressure on businesses already battling months of More

Traffic lights proposed for two key intersections

Traffic lights are set to be installed at two busy Sunshine Coast intersections that have a history of crashes. The Department of Transport and Main More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share