100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Clubs backed as stadium expansion nears

A $9 million program will support sports groups in the vicinity of Sunshine Coast Stadium, which will be upgraded for the 2032 Games. The state More

Regional media welcomes direction of news funding changes

Country Press Australia says the proposed News Bargaining Incentive reforms could provide greater support for regional and local journalism, but the final rules will More

Your say: public housing, traffic petition and more

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. You must include your name More

Approved resort project back in talks

An approved 90-unit project at a popular Sunshine Coast resort is heading back to the negotiating table, almost two years after plans were first More

Over the limit: tower plan open to public feedback

The Sunshine Coast community is being invited to have its say about a proposed 18-storey coastal tower, which would rise almost 23m above the More

Fears of funding blow to welfare service ease

A reported $4.7 million funding cut facing homelessness service Youturn will not immediately go ahead, according to Noosa MP Sandy Bolton. Reports from Queensland Parliament’s More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share