100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Company shows $40m vote of confidence in Coast

A Sunshine Coast property fund manager will settle this month on the last of six properties it intends developing in one of the nation’s More

Work starts on new town centre, including major supermarkets

Construction has officially started on a new town centre that will feature two prominent grocery stores and a range of services. Stockland has commenced work More

Free water service on tap at community events

Thirsty locals and visitors have filled the equivalent of 70,000 reusable water bottles with fresh, healthy drinking water over the last 12 months thanks More

Panic buying pushing fuel prices higher, servo owner says

A Sunshine Coast fuel station owner says panic buying – not a national shortage – is largely behind recent price spikes and local supply More

Plan lodged for 32 townhouses on corner block

A 32-townhouse development has been proposed for a prominent corner site in the growing suburb of Nirimba. The project would occupy a 4011sqm parcel at More

Concerns sign could ‘dominate’ town’s streetscape

A community group has expressed its concerns about a large sign that could be installed beside the main street of a Sunshine Coast town. The More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share