100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Bridge traffic improves as more fixes explored

New traffic conditions at a key bridge appear to have reduced delays, as the local council considers more options to help commuters. Authorities opened a More

Scores of e-bikes, e-scooters seized in clampdown

More than 100 e-bikes and e-scooters have been confiscated and hundreds of fines have been issued during the first 10 days of Queensland's tougher More

Waterfront site earmarked for apartment project

A prominent waterfront site could be the location of a new luxury apartment building under plans lodged with Sunshine Coast Council. The development application seeks More

‘Premium’ beachside retirement village moves ahead

A new retirement living community is set to take shape on the Sunshine Coast, with the sod turning on a beachside development. BlueCare’s Bokarina Beach More

Revised service station sign approved by council

A scaled-back pylon sign proposed for a service station in Yandina has been given the green light by Sunshine Coast Council, months after community More

Dog access criticised over impact on disabled residents

A Sunshine Coast councillor has renewed his opposition to changes to dog access areas, claiming the loss of off-leash spaces has had unintended impacts More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share