100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

New $24m highway service centre officially opens

A new service hub has officially opened beside the Bruce Highway between Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast, offering fuel and food for more than More

Funding for stretch of scenic coastal walkway

More than $1.1 million has been allocated to upgrade a section of beachside pathway with expansive ocean views. Sunshine Coast Council’s 2026-2027 budget included funds More

Coveted equine holding sold to local investor

A landmark property at the heart of the Sunshine Coast's horse racing industry has changed hands in a $4 million off-market transaction. The sprawling equine More

Growing community welcomes new early learning centre

An independent Queensland childcare provider has opened its first Sunshine Coast centre in Australia’s largest masterplanned community. Joy Early Learning opened a new centre in More

UniSC ranks first nationally to tackle hunger

A Sunshine Coast university has been named Australia's best for efforts to reduce hunger, while also emerging as Queensland's leading institution for protecting land More

‘Quicksand of crime’: new youth bail law under fire

First there was "Adult Crime, Adult Time". Now Queensland's Liberal National government has a new slogan after bolstering the controversial legislation – "Breach Bail, Go More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share