100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Markets pump $54m into Coast economy each year

The Eumundi Markets have been confirmed as a tourism powerhouse for the Sunshine Coast, with a new independent report revealing the iconic attraction generates More

Crushed turtles prompt warning to stay off dunes

Drivers are being asked to show care on beaches after turtle hatchlings were reportedly found crushed in vehicle tracks. Loggerhead and green turtles are in More

Coast to host trans-Tasman Test on Anzac Day

The Sunshine Coast is set to host a historic Test match featuring the Australia and New Zealand women's rugby teams on Anzac Day. The Wallaroos More

Jane Stephens: feeding our pet peeves

There are countless seemingly harmless things others do that can trigger strong reactions. And while it is one thing to be annoyed by someone More

Prominent lawyer hits career milestone ‘for six’

After 25 years of dedicated service to the Sunshine Coast community, respected local lawyer Chris Baker will retire at the end of February, marking More

Photo of the day: ‘hungry’ fisherman

This 'dusky' photo of a fisherman hungry for a bite was taken by photographer Jo Allayialis from Cotton Tree pier. If you have a photo More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share