100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Upgrade to herald new chapter for library

Improvements are about to be made to a community facility that welcomes almost 150,000 visitors a year. Infrastructure works will take place at the Noosaville More

‘Shoes optional’ cafe brings riverside experience

A new cafe has opened at a familiar riverside site, with its signature focaccia sandwiches quickly becoming a customer favourite. River Kind has launched at More

New group to help manage tourism at holiday hotspot

A new advisory body will be formed to help balance tourism, community wellbeing and environmental protection at one of Queensland’s best-known holiday destinations. Noosa Council More

New clinic brings palliative care closer

A palliative care outpatient clinic has opened in the Sunshine Coast hinterland, allowing patients to receive specialised support closer to home. The service has started More

Luxury waterfront home dominates building awards

A luxury waterfront home that has already earned a swag of industry accolades has added another seven awards to its growing collection. The Mooloolaba residence, More

Your say: seawall safety, flooding hotspots and more

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. You must include your name More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share