100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Police appeal for information after alleged assault

Police are appealing for public assistance following an alleged late-night assault on the Sunshine Coast. It is alleged that a group of eight males approached More

‘On holidays’: flatmate’s claim after mum went missing

The daughter of a missing woman discovered her mother's valuables had been taken by a housemate later accused of her murder, a jury has More

‘Very bad look’: defender given three-game ban

Brisbane Lions defender Ty Gallop has been suspended for three games for a serious misconduct act he admits is a "very bad look" for More

Net-zero energy neighbourhood planned

All homes in a new residential development will feature solar and battery systems designed to generate enough renewable energy to meet household needs each More

Dozens of weapons seized in region under Jack’s Law

Police have seized multiple weapons after scanning thousands of people on the Sunshine Coast in the first year since Jack's Law was made permanent More

Green light for 90-bed backpacker hostel

A backpacker hostel has been approved for the heart of Maroochydore. Sunshine Coast Council has given the go ahead for a 90-bed short-term accommodation development More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share