100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Roads inundated as heavy rain hits region

Heavy rain has battered the Sunshine Coast, with flash flooding, road closures and dozens of phone calls for SES assistance. Council and emergency services on More

Vacant entertainment site gets new life

An entertainment precinct left vacant for nine months is set to be transformed into a new sporting venue. Padelground: Station Yards will open at the More

Dog owners renew call for secure park

More than two years after councillors received a 400-plus-signature request for a fenced dog park, a new petition is again pressing for a secure More

Overflow parking ruled out for holiday season

A foreshore park will remain public open space this Christmas rather than being used for overflow parking during the busy holiday period. Lions Park at More

Pharmacist named Queensland’s best

A Sunshine Coast pharmacist has been recognised for expanding local healthcare services and helping vulnerable patients maintain access to treatment. Sean Fitzpatrick was named Queensland More

Ashley Robinson: America and its baffling contradictions

I really struggle to get my head around the US being described as the leader of the free world, especially when I look at More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share