100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Hit-run appeal and power line electrocution

Two serious incidents on the Coast on Thursday night have left a teenage cyclist injured and a young man fighting for life following an More

Fast-food chain confirmed, retail giant rumoured for plaza

A fast-food chain is poised to open a store at Sunshine Plaza, amid speculation that a major global apparel brand could also be preparing More

Second wave of homesites set for 6000-home suburb

The next batch of lots in the Sunshine Coast’s fastest-growing corridor will be released this week, as pressure builds to keep pace with the More

Police target unruly behaviour across bus network

Sunshine Coast police have launched an operation to curb anti-social behaviour and boost passenger safety across the region's bus system. Local officers are involved in More

Work to start on replacement lifesaving facility

Construction is about to start on a new surf lifesaving facility at one of the Sunshine Coast's most popular beaches. Sunshine Coast Council will replace More

Biosecurity officers appointed to tackle pests on Coast

The state government has tasked five people to help combat invasive species on the Sunshine Coast. The biosecurity officers have been appointed to identify and More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share