100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Unused cemetery plots to be reclaimed under new policy

A new policy could see hundreds of long-unused cemetery plots returned for community use. The proposal, which is due to be formally adopted at Noosa More

‘Premier destination’: tourism operators earn Queensland acclaim

A record number of Sunshine Coast tourism businesses have been recognised among the state's best, highlighting the region’s strength as a leading visitor destination. Almost More

Search underway after alleged knife attack

Police are appealing for information after a 20-year-old Buderim man was wounded at Maroochydore on Thursday night. Emergency services were called to Duporth Avenue about More

Your say: hotel height, holiday park and more

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. You must include your name More

Glamping boom heads to farm paddocks

A working cattle property could become home to eight eco-style tourist cabins under plans lodged with Sunshine Coast Council. The development application, submitted on May More

Chef from top-tier venues opens first restaurant

A renowned chef who once shared a kitchen with celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay has opened his first restaurant on the Sunshine Coast, bringing a More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share