100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Supermarket explains increased security measures

A supermarket has introduced licensed security personnel as part of initiatives to improve safety for staff and customers. White’s IGA on Jones Street in Mooloolah More

Girls rally to kick school soccer ban out

A soccer rule at a Sunshine Coast school has been given the boot after a group of girls rallied their classmates and took their More

Coast’s Business Woman of the Year named

The region's businesswomen have been recognised for their achievements at the 27th annual Sunshine Coast Business Women’s Network Awards. The awards were presented at Venue More

Fundraisers invited to splash out for inclusive sport

The Coast community is being urged to take the plunge for a special fundraising event. The region’s inaugural Special Olympics Polar Plunge will take place More

Ashley Robinson: ramping up the care factor

So, it was an interesting week last week when I had a medical episode at work. I won’t go into specifics, as you don’t More

Two taken to hospital after crash

Police are appealing for dashcam vision as investigations continue into a traffic crash on the Sunshine Coast. Initial enquiries indicate a red Holden Commodore was More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share