100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Council weighs stripped-back pathway plan

A contentious plan to reshape a coastal street could be replaced by a simpler pathway project without traffic calming, formalised parking or reduced speed More

Two new rangers but vehicle permit cap not backed

Two new rangers will be deployed to a coastal region, but the local MP says a peak-period cap on vehicle permits for a recreation More

Charity steps up mobile support plans

A volunteer-run charity supporting people experiencing homelessness is closing in on a $50,000 fundraising target for a dedicated outreach vehicle. The Table of St Francis More

Ashley Robinson: beware, outraged hypocrites ahead

Last week, I wrote about people booing racehorses, which I found quite bizarre – only to run across another weird thing this week. There has More

Coastal pathway section complete with new boardwalk

The renewal of a popular section of coastal pathway is finished, with the opening of a new elevated boardwalk. The Alexandra Headland Coastal Pathway Upgrade More

Remediation at landmark bridge slated for replacement

A two-month maintenance project has started on a well-known Sunshine Coast bridge that is ultimately planned to be removed and replaced. Remediation work is underway More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share