100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Rare piece of Coast history for sale

A Buderim homestead believed to be the oldest residence on the Sunshine Coast still being lived in has hit the market, offering a rare More

Coast–led study sheds new light on exercise and ageing

New research led by University of the Sunshine Coast (UniSC) academics is examining how different exercise intensities affect body composition in older adults. The study More

‘Major growth’: local business at forefront of energy boom

A local solar business says the Sunshine Coast is riding the crest of Australia’s renewable energy boom, with growing demand from both homeowners and More

Photo of the day: early swimmers

Photographer Helen Browne captured the moment a friend of hers took an early morning dip at Mooloolaba Beach. The glass-like reflection in the sand More

Cyber expert murder investigation sees fourth man charged

A fourth person has been charged in connection with the disappearance and alleged murder of a cybersecurity expert last year. Brisbane father Andrew Burow vanished More

Man transported in potentially life-threatening condition after crash

A man in his 60s has been taken to hospital in a potentially life-threatening condition following a vehicle and motorcycle crash in Buderim. Police were More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share