100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

‘Incredibly hard’: iconic waterfront dining venue to close

One of the Sunshine Coast’s premier waterfront dining and event venues is set to close following negotiations with its landlord, with just a few More

‘Very strange’: rocket wows onlookers

A Chinese rocket has dazzled stargazers on the Sunshine Coast and beyond. Locals took to social media on Tuesday night to share their experiences, after More

Future uncertain for prime site after appeal ends

The future of a prominent site remains unclear after an appeal over a rejected development proposal came to an end. The 12,775sqm property at David More

Full throttle on new F1 Coast offering

Whether backing Max Verstappen, Lewis Hamilton or Australia's own Oscar Piastri, Formula One fans are likely to appreciate the Sunshine Coast's newest hospitality offering. F1 More

Council stands by dog fee hike amid backlash

Sunshine Coast Council is defending its proposed changes to dog registration fees amid public backlash from residents. Under the changes, registration fees for desexed dogs More

Plan for innovative waste-to-resource facility

A water utility is progressing plans for a facility on the Sunshine Coast that would turn wastewater by-products into a reusable resource. Unitywater has lodged More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share