100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Search is on for missing time capsule

A decades-old mystery has sent former students, teachers and locals digging through memories after a buried piece of school history seemingly vanished without a More

Falcons defy the odds to lead Qld rugby league comp

The Sunshine Coast Falcons have strung together eight straight wins to claim top spot on the Queensland Cup ladder, despite being one of the More

Construction progresses on school’s new campus

A college offering an alternative education pathway for disengaged senior high school students is set to relocate to a new campus in 2027. Kairos Community More

Ashley Robinson: age has a degree of difficulty

Maybe it’s not too late for me to become smarter by earning some qualifications at the ripe old age of 69. The other day, I More

Masterplanned community gets federal environment tick

A major new Sunshine Coast housing project has cleared a key hurdle, with the Commonwealth Government granting environmental approval. Stockland’s Aura South was given the More

Appeal to be lodged over store owner attack sentences

The Acting Attorney-General has instructed the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to lodge an appeal against sentences handed down in the Maroochydore More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share