100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

New Sunday market brings life to waterfront

A new market is set to bring handmade goods, live music and family entertainment to a popular waterfront destination. The Noosa Marina Sunday Markets will More

Summer swimming returns after pool upgrade

A major upgrade has brought swimmers back to a popular 50m pool, with summer operating hours now underway. The three-month project has delivered a major More

‘More than a place to buy plants’: garden centre to close

A garden centre that has sold plants and supplies for years while supporting young people with disability and autism will soon shut. The Steps Garden More

Ashley Robinson: make moments to remember

I have never been much of a fan of Father’s Day, Mother’s Day or Easter, mainly because of how commercial they all are. I More

Dairy farm strikes new deal after setback

A family-owned dairy farm has secured a new market for its milk after months of uncertainty over its future processor. The Rozynski family, which has More

Caravan maker enters administration after 26 years

A Sunshine Coast manufacturer of off-road campers and caravans has entered administration after more than two decades in business. Australian Off Road announced on Tuesday More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share