100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Jetstar to slug passengers for overhead baggage storage

Storing carry-on baggage in overhead lockers on Jetstar flights will cost as much as $52 one-way, as the budget airline announces new charges for More

Falcons star’s injury comeback gets a boost

After a frustrating season on the sidelines, Sunshine Coast Falcons winger Nat McGavin is making his way back to rugby league thanks to support More

Census to reveal extent of Coast housing crisis

New figures are expected to show the impact of the region’s housing crisis, amid fears many more people are sleeping rough. More than 1200 Sunshine More

Hidden architectural gems welcome visitors

A 10-day festival is set to celebrate a decade of architecture, design and community on the Coast. Sunshine Coast Open House (SCOH) returns from October More

B2B: with new financial year, review any waste in expenses

Waste can account for up to 30 per cent of the operating costs of a business. Unfortunately, waste is often simply accepted as the operating More

Swimmer out of leadership group after drinking

Australian swimmer Isaac Cooper has stepped down from the Dolphins' leadership group after a drinking session at the Commonwealth Games. Cooper, who is a member More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share