100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Business 2 Businses: Excluded children claim it was all mum’s fault

Sponsored Content

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Sami Muirhead: smile and say ‘cheesecake’

Do you have a dish that is your absolute favourite thing in the world? Perhaps it’s a creation that, when someone who loves you More

B2B: as if!

Sometimes two little words can make a very big difference. In a recent Queensland Supreme Court decision, those words were 'as if'. The case concerned More

Council gives green light for Buddhist centre

A major Buddhist centre has won approval for a significant expansion on the Sunshine Coast. In Eudlo, the Chenrezig Institute has been issued a development More

Offshore site ruled out for dredged sediment disposal

An area off the Sunshine Coast is no longer being considered as a potential site for placing dredged sediment from a large-scale Port of More

Auto retail giant opens first new-format store

The managing director of a prominent auto retailer says the Sunshine Coast is the ideal location to launch the first of many specialty stores More

Young fur seal surprises on Sunshine Coast

A young long-nosed fur seal has made an unexpected extended stay at a Sunshine Coast beach, prompting interest from beachgoers and marine experts. The seal More

It is not uncommon for parents to exclude children from their will – especially where the relationship between the parent and the child has soured.

As you can imagine, the reasons for a breakdown of the relationship between a parent and child can be many and varied.

In a recent decision, the New South Wales Supreme Court had to determine whether a challenge by two adult children to their mother’s will would succeed.

The mother left her $1.6 million estate to her sister and specifically excluded her son and daughter because:

a) they had contested their father’s will;

b) they prevented her seeing her grandchildren; and

c) she had no ongoing relationship with either child.

The children’s explanation was that “it was all mum’s doing” – giving examples of their mother’s physical and verbal abuse towards them.

The court found that the relationship breakdown was mostly due to the mother’s behaviour and that the children had attempted to reconcile with her.

Ultimately, the court made orders that the son receive an amount from the estate of $250,000 and the daughter receive $300,000.

The court also made some comments on how it deals with estrangement and tensions within family relationships.

Every case is different!

Trent Wakerley, Director, Kruger Law, Level 3, Ocean Central, Ocean Street, Maroochydore, 5443 9600, krugerlaw.com.au

This column is part of our Business 2 Business (B2B) series featuring industry leaders sharing their expertise. For more great articles, SUBSCRIBE to our FREE news feed, direct to your inbox daily. All you need to do is enter your email below.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share